
Originally Posted by
D10
Good question, but in a situation like Conway, a minimum length limit will boost the number of larger fish by allowing the crappie to reach at least 10-in before harvest. This only works when you have good growth (Conway has excellent growth) and mortality is high. We estimated Lake Conway's total annual mortality to be around 75%, with 68% coming from harvest alone! Creel limits have very little impact on the population structure compared to length limits. It was raised to 30 state wide in an attempt to simplifiy the regulations a little. It made no sense that some of the best crappie lakes had lower creel limits than poor crappie lakes. There was no biological justification. Some new data analysis techniques are being developed that will allow us to evaluate the impact of increasing or decreasing creel limits on a population. I will be reexamining our creel limit's once I figure it all out. But think of it this way, What percentage of Lake Conway's crappie anglers harvest 20 or more crappie per trip. Not a very big percentage at all. This is the case on most lakes. You have a few CrappiePros that can flat wear them out, but the majority of us don't regularly catch 20 keepers in a trip. So raising the creel limit to 30 wont make much of an impact because very few anglers could catch 20 keepers. Does this make sense?