Likes Likes:  14
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Toronto 2014?

  1. 01-06-2015, 12:33 PM #11
    Blackdog40's Avatar
    Blackdog40
    Blackdog40 is offline Crappie.com 1K Star General
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lebo.Ks
    Posts
    1,976
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Sorry to start such a fuss, will keep mouth shut form now on.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 01-06-2015, 04:08 PM #12
    imajigger2
    imajigger2 is offline Trophy King II
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    371
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Your opinion has as much value as anyone elses BD, no need to be quiet, after all they are all only opinions. A study over ten years on Perry concluded that the length and creel limits basically did not effect anything to the better, I believe it was posted on here at one time. If they concluded it had no effects why is the restriction still on? It is still on because it is a feel good measure by the fishermen, this can be the only answer if Biologists did the conclusions. For those of us who trust to the Biologists why doesn't these length and creel limits get removed after sound research on Perry Lake? As another poster suggested most of us police ourselves and if it is good to remove some of the smaller fish then there are plenty who would do that.
    Likes fishlessDan LIKED above post
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 01-06-2015, 08:05 PM #13
    mkeller
    mkeller is offline Crappie Wall Hanger II
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    piqua,kansas
    Posts
    635
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Blackdog, your post was as worthy as anyone elses. No need to feel sorry or affended, everyone has the right to voice their opinion and be heard, thats what makes our country great. I read alot of good points from others that make me rethink some of my opinions and beliefs. Thats what makes this site great. Enjoy your posts, keep them coming.
    Likes fishlessDan LIKED above post
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 01-06-2015, 08:07 PM #14
    walleyecrazy839
    walleyecrazy839 is offline Trophy King
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Topeka
    Posts
    214
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My 2 cents .If a lake is chucked full of shad and small crappie , Make a half and half limit 10 small fish and 10 over 10 inches. If Crappie life is 5 years taking the smaller fish should help the larger fish grow at a faster rate. also a larger crappie will eat and be able to eat larger shad. I am mostly a walleye fisher I know this will not work for most novice crappie fishermen. What works for walleye in the mainly walleye northern lakes. is keep the 13 to 15 inch a few up to 20 and one over 20. Leave the spawners in the lake for the most part. I don't see what it would hurt to let fishermen keep a few small fish along with a few larger fish. In the long run it should increase the numbers of larger fish. and that is what most of us are looking for . And you wont see all those smaller fish floating on top of the water. I don't think all lakes should be lumped into the same regulations for each lake. get more creative on length and creel limits. Like they say you don't know until you try.
    Likes springhillwantabe, fishlessDan LIKED above post
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

BACK TO TOP